Featured Post

Tuesday, 16 August 2011

Coronation Street: is there a gay agenda?​

by Chris Billett, guest blogging for thecustardtv

There’s been talk again recently about the supposed 'gay agenda' of Coronation Street, from the usual suspects, in the usual places. It’s something that rears its ugly head every now and then when the press run out of single mothers and immigrants to hound. It seemed to have been prompted by something David Cameron said about same-sex kissing, pre-watershed, but the details escape me for now, and frankly the details bore and offend me.

A lot of the criticism seems to be that it is not representative of real life. “There would never be that many gay/ lesbian/ transgender/ cross-dressers on one street!” they cry. “Our children don’t need it shoved down their throats when real life isn’t even like that!” Let’s first ignore the fact that straight men who wear wigs for kicks (Audrey’s latest fella, incidentally) have little, if anything, to do with the LGBT community, and focus on context and the criticisms themselves.

Coronation Street, although supposedly a small back street, is set in Manchester after all.

Manchester is a city proud of its large and diverse communities, the LGBT community being one of the largest in the UK. Manchester Pride is a ten day celebration and there’s also Sparkle, a national transgender festival lasting three days. A community so big can’t be squeezed into a few loft apartments on Canal Street. We have to spread out! You might well find a gay man living on your street, his partner visiting from London. And it’s not inconceivable that a teenage girl on the same street might also discover she’s gay and have her girlfriend stay in her home. As for a transgender neighbour, well it would be rude to ask anyway, so who knows? Anyway, of course the diversity is exaggerated. Everything in a soap is exaggerated; that’s exactly why so many millions watch them. If you want real life, hold a glass up to your neighbour's wall. I guarantee it will be a lot less thrilling.
Norris gets groovy as Eartha Kitt

So, aside from the daft idea that there are 'too many' gays, what about the 'gay agenda'? What is a gay agenda? I have never really known or been bothered to find out, so I am going to assume it means 'forcing homosexuality down our kids’ throats in order that they grow up to believe homosexuality is a normal and positive thing'. That’s what people usually seem to mean, however they choose to phrase it. So my response to that would be yes, I think Corrie does have a gay agenda and it’s all the better for it.

Coronation Street was created by a gay man and has always had a camp sensibility. Each of its five decades has had its share of gay icons (often in the formidable landladies), and featured strong, troubled female characters, highly favoured by the pink community. It has always had an undeniably camp humour running through it (who remembers Norris as Eartha Kitt in the Rovers’ Stars in their Eyes?) which has appealed to not only gay people but a vast cross section of society.

Roy and Hayley finally tied the knot, legally, in
 August 2010
It hasn’t always been at the cutting edge of gay storylines though, and was years behind other soaps when introducing gay characters, although they were the first, and until recently only, soap to feature a transgender character. Hayley Cropper has been around now since 1998 and is one of the show’s best loved characters. Her previous biological sex is rarely mentioned and she is a valued member of the community.

But since it did start introducing LGBT characters, Corrie has proved itself to be exemplary in handling their story-lines and scenes. It’s a fact that a lot of gay people work on the show and it shows.

There is no sensationalism (leave that to the tabloids) and coming-out stories have been sensitive and credible. The established gay and lesbian characters are mostly incidentally gay; it’s simply another facet to their lives. They don’t have a stream of “gay issues” and are just living their lives the same as everyone else.

And that can have a powerful effect. I strongly believe that television has done wonders for gay equality in the last fifteen or so years. Gay people have become highly visible and feature on some of the UK’s top shows. Soaps portraying gays as just ordinary people can only help to improve our PR which is already on the up. If that means Corrie having a gay agenda then bring it on!

Follow Chris on Twitter


Tannice said...

A beautifully succinct run down of the gay agenda in Corrie and why, if there is one, it will normalise this to the casual reader. Get used to it conservatives (with a small 'c')!

Martin said...

Neighbours probably did it first. I didn't even think this was an issue anymore these days...seriously.

What small sect of some remote village makes an issue out of such things?

I mean "are you being served" gave up a camp stereotype that is probably more questionable than characters being ordinary people.

Very peculiar.

Anonymous said...

A question: Has Corrie's effort to update and reflect on today's social structure been successful or not? Have these changes in themes and characters improved the ratings,or not? Are these changes done to please the audience? If not, what should be done to bring back the lost viewers? Or is the loss worthwhile?

Anonymous said...

Have these changes improved the ratings? If not, why not?

Recent Posts 2